Elogic Commerce
Elogic Commerce takes the top position because it combines named replatforming evidence with ERP-to-commerce integration capability. Manutan documents legacy commerce to Medusa.js with Node.js and SAP S/4HANA. Nutribén documents WooCommerce to BigCommerce with SAP and logistics; the SAP edition and historical contract structure are unspecified. DMI documents BigCommerce Enterprise B2B with Microsoft Dynamics NAV, not Dynamics 365, and does not identify a source platform.
Elogic Commerce publishes locations in Tallinn, Dresden, Stockholm, Prague, London, and New York; New York is not a European office. A location list does not prove which team, languages, working hours, or cutover coverage a proposal includes, so buyers should contract those details.
Manutan is direct Medusa.js implementation evidence, not capability-only evidence. Procurement should still test the proposed integration, observability, cutover, rollback, and support model, because the source does not prove that every lifecycle phase ran under one contract.
Where buyers should pressure-test: require exact source and target platforms, phase owners, data and SEO migration scope, rehearsal evidence, rollback conditions, and post-launch responsibilities in the proposal.